It's Christmas, and we have peace and love! Yammas! We don't disagree that much, anyway.
I think it's important to distinguish between a travelogue, a commercial, and a documentary. If were still a producer I would regard the series as having failed to be a successful example of any of them.
The only positives were seeing Noula, Sally and Cerys. Even if I hadn't been to AS I think I would have fallen in love. It was, perhaps, a bad move to tip the grass cuttings into the stream on camera, but then I've always had a penchant for naughty girls.
The artist in Agios Stephanos NE seemed quite interesting - but the production was so bad that we didn't get a full-screen image. If you're going to shoot an exhibition opening it's number one to show some of the work. Point camera at picture and lock the tripod. Shoot a few seconds. Or take some good stills to use in the edit. Instead, a load of people drinking bubbly was the most we really had. This was a recurrent failure in the series.
It would be wrong to run a lengthy commercial for Corfu, so at least that wasn't fulfilled. I get the feeling that the researcher was told to run around finding examples of rich and poor Brits, with a few token Greeks in the mixture if possible. Documentary, then, not - I would be interested to know where the money for the very posh buses came from, where the EU strategic money for things like the Avliotes bypass went, what the political relationship between Corfu and Athens was. I'd like to know the relationship between the major tour operators and the commanding heights of the local economy was. This does not have to be boring. In fact, it would have enhanced our knowledge, and that's the point of a documentary.
There are some deep and dark questions to be asked about the way Corfu runs. Nepotism is probably high on the list. A real documentary should take a stab at that. It didn't.